Governance, Accountability and How I Will Serve
Municipal government works best when residents understand how decisions are being made, Council understands what the community expects, and elected officials are willing to explain the choices they make.
That does not mean everyone will agree with every decision. They won't.
Council regularly has to make decisions where there are competing priorities, limited money, legal requirements, technical advice, and very different opinions about what should happen. Sometimes there simply isn't an option that makes everyone happy.
My responsibility is not to tell residents what I think they want to hear.
It is to do the homework, understand the issue, listen to the people affected, ask questions when something doesn't make sense, and then make the best decision I can with the information available.
If I vote for something, I should be prepared to explain why.
If I vote against something, I should be prepared to explain that too.
And if better information changes my mind, I should be prepared to say so.
YOU SHOULD NEVER HAVE TO GUESS WHY I VOTED THE WAY I DID.
Be accessible
Being elected should not make someone harder to reach.
Residents should be able to ask questions, raise concerns, challenge a decision, or simply have a conversation with the people they elected. I have tried to make myself available throughout my first term, whether that is through email, phone calls, social media, conversations around town, or public meetings.
Accessibility also means being willing to have conversations when someone disagrees with me.
Those conversations are not always comfortable, but they are part of the job. I would rather have someone call me and tell me why they think Council got something wrong than have them believe there is no point in trying to talk to us.
I cannot promise that every conversation will change my vote or produce the answer someone wants.
I can promise that I will listen.
Explain the decisions
Residents should not have to follow every Council agenda or read hundreds of pages of reports to understand what their municipal government is doing.
Part of the responsibility of being elected is explaining decisions in plain language - what Council decided, why the issue was in front of us, what the options were, what it will cost, and what the decision means for residents.
That is especially important when the decision is unpopular.
It is easy to communicate when everyone agrees. The harder responsibility is explaining why Council made a decision that some residents strongly disagree with and being willing to answer questions about it afterward.
There will also be times when I cannot share everything I know. Closed meetings, legal matters, personnel issues, land negotiations, and other confidential matters have rules around what Council can disclose.
When that happens, I will respect those obligations.
But confidentiality should never become a convenient excuse to avoid explaining what can be explained.
CONFIDENTIALITY SHOULD NEVER BECOME A CONVENIENT EXCUSE TO AVOID EXPLAINING WHAT CAN BE EXPLAINED.
Listen before the decision, not just after it
Public engagement is most useful when there is still an opportunity for it to influence the outcome.
I want residents involved early enough that their experience, concerns, and ideas can actually help shape the options Council considers.
That does not mean every suggestion can or should be adopted, but asking people what they think after the important decisions have already been made is not meaningful engagement.
Council also has a responsibility to explain the constraints before asking for input.
If legislation limits our options, if a project has a defined budget, or if something simply is not within municipal jurisdiction, residents should know that before we ask them what they want.
Otherwise, we risk creating expectations that Council never had the ability to deliver.
Engagement should help Council make a more informed decision, not simply demonstrate that engagement occurred.
LISTEN WHILE THERE IS STILL SOMETHING TO DECIDE.
Ask questions and challenge assumptions
One of the most important things a councillor can do is ask questions.
Council receives recommendations from District Staff, consultants, outside agencies, developers, community organizations, and many others. Those recommendations often come from people with significant expertise, and that expertise deserves respect.
Respect does not mean accepting every recommendation without question.
I want to understand the assumptions behind a recommendation, what alternatives were considered, what the risks are, what it will cost now and over the long term, and what happens if Council chooses a different direction.
Sometimes the answer will confirm that the recommendation in front of us is the right approach. Sometimes a question will uncover something that deserves another look.
The purpose is not to challenge people for the sake of challenging them.
It is to make sure Council understands what it is approving before we vote.
RESPECT THE EXPERTISE. ASK THE QUESTIONS.
Understand the promise before making it
AI can be a useful tool. It can help research an issue, organize information, challenge an idea, and communicate something more clearly.
But it can also make it very easy to sound like you understand something you don't.
That matters in an election campaign.
Before I promise residents that I am going to fix something, I think I have a responsibility to understand the issue myself.
-
Is it actually within municipal jurisdiction?
-
What would it cost?
-
Who has the authority to make the decision?
-
What work would District Staff have to complete first?
-
Does legislation allow us to do it?
-
Does it require another level of government?
-
And if it requires a decision of Council, can I actually deliver it, or can I only commit to bringing the idea forward and casting one vote?
Those questions matter more to me than whether a campaign promise sounds convincing.
AI and other technology will continue to change, and I am comfortable using tools that help me do my homework. But the judgement, accountability, and responsibility for what I put in front of residents have to remain mine.
If I make you a promise, I should understand it well enough to explain how we would actually get it done.
UNDERSTAND THE PROMISE BEFORE YOU MAKE IT.
One councillor gets one vote
One of the easiest mistakes to make during an election campaign is talking as though one councillor can simply make something happen.
We can't.
Sparwood has a seven-member Council. A councillor can bring an idea forward, ask questions, advocate for a position, request that something be considered, and ultimately cast a vote. But no individual councillor gets to decide the outcome.
That distinction matters when making campaign commitments.
I can tell residents what I will support, what I will advocate for, what questions I will ask, and what I will bring forward for consideration. I cannot honestly promise that six other elected people will agree with me.
That is not avoiding accountability. It is being clear about how municipal government actually works.
I will make my position clear and work to build support for the things I believe will benefit Sparwood. But when something requires a decision of Council, I will describe it that way.
ONE COUNCILLOR. ONE VOTE.
BE CLEAR ABOUT WHAT ONE PERSON CAN ACTUALLY DELIVER.
Experience matters, but so do new ideas
Experience on Council matters.
Understanding municipal legislation, budgets, infrastructure, development processes, regional relationships, and the history behind previous decisions makes it easier to understand what is actually in front of you and what questions need to be asked.
But experience can become a weakness if it turns into "this is how we have always done it."
The next Council will have new members, and that is an opportunity. New councillors will bring different experiences, different questions, and ideas that may not have been considered before.
If I am returned to Council, I want to bring the knowledge I gained during my first term to that table while remaining open to being challenged by the people joining it.
Institutional knowledge should help us avoid repeating old mistakes.
It should never prevent us from finding a better way.
EXPERIENCE SHOULD HELP US AVOID OLD MISTAKES.
IT SHOULD NEVER PREVENT US FROM FINDING A BETTER WAY.
Own the decisions
Council will not get every decision right.
Sometimes new information becomes available. Sometimes circumstances change. Sometimes an approach that looked reasonable on paper does not work the way we expected once it is implemented.
When that happens, I do not think the answer is to defend a decision simply because I voted for it.
If something is not working, Council should be prepared to revisit it. If I change my position, I should be prepared to explain what changed and why.
Accountability also means owning the votes that do not go the way I wanted. Council decisions belong to Council once they are made. I can explain why I voted differently, but I still have a responsibility to work constructively with the decision that was made.
Residents can already review Council agendas, minutes, recordings, and summaries through the District's Council Portal and Council Facts publications, so there is a public record against which elected officials can be held accountable.
OWN THE VOTE.
OWN THE OUTCOME.
Respect the public's money
Every dollar the District spends comes from somewhere.
Property taxes, utility fees, grants, reserves, borrowing, and other sources may appear differently in a municipal budget, but none of them should be treated as free money.
Council has a responsibility to understand not only what something costs to build or purchase, but what it will cost to operate, maintain, repair, and eventually replace.
A grant can make a project possible, but it does not automatically make the project worthwhile. If accepting outside funding commits Sparwood taxpayers to costs they cannot reasonably sustain afterward, Council needs to understand that before saying yes.
The same applies to smaller spending decisions. Individually, they may not move the tax rate very much. Collectively, they can.
I will continue asking what something costs, what obligation it creates in the future, whether it is a municipal responsibility, and whether the benefit justifies the expense.
That does not mean always choosing the cheapest option.
It means remembering whose money we are spending.
REMEMBER WHOSE MONEY WE ARE SPENDING.
Keep learning
Four years on Council has taught me how much there is to learn about municipal government.
Legislation changes. Provincial requirements change. Communities grow. Infrastructure ages. New technology creates different opportunities, and sometimes the assumptions behind an old decision no longer apply.
I do not expect District Staff, consultants, or other members of Council to simply give me an answer and have me repeat it. I want to understand enough about an issue to ask informed questions and make a responsible decision.
That also means recognizing when someone else knows more about a subject than I do.
There is no weakness in asking for clarification, seeking expert advice, attending training, or admitting that I need more information before I am ready to make a decision.
I have invested considerable time during my first term learning how municipal government works, and I intend to keep doing that.
The more I understand the job, the better questions I can ask.
THE MORE I UNDERSTAND THE JOB, THE BETTER QUESTIONS I CAN ASK.
Listening can change a decision
Listening only matters if there is a possibility that what you hear can change your mind.
I have changed my position on issues during my first term when residents raised concerns, new information became available, or the consequences of a decision became clearer.
I do not see that as weakness or inconsistency.
There is a difference between having principles and becoming so attached to a position that no amount of new information can change it.
Residents should expect me to come to Council prepared and with an informed position. They should also expect me to listen to the debate, consider the information presented, and remain open to changing that position when there is a reason to do so.
The objective should be getting to the right decision, not proving that my first opinion was right.
THE OBJECTIVE IS THE RIGHT DECISION - NOT PROVING MY FIRST OPINION WAS RIGHT.
What does success look like?
For me, success is not everyone agreeing with every decision I make.
That is never going to happen.
Success is residents knowing where I stand and why. It is people feeling comfortable raising a concern even when they know I may not agree with them. It is Council asking the right questions before committing public money and being willing to revisit a decision when circumstances change.
It is meaningful public engagement early enough to influence the outcome.
It is respecting the expertise of District Staff without giving up Council's responsibility to question, challenge, and ultimately make the decision.
It is being clear about what municipal government can actually deliver, what requires the cooperation of others, and what one councillor can realistically promise.
And it is being able to look back at the end of another term and know that I showed up prepared, listened, did the homework, explained my decisions, and took responsibility for the votes I cast.
I will not always get it right.
But residents should never have to wonder whether I took the responsibility seriously.
RESIDENTS SHOULD NEVER HAVE TO WONDER WHETHER I TOOK THE RESPONSIBILITY SERIOUSLY.
What I Won't Promise
Campaigns make it easy to promise things.
The harder part is understanding who has the authority to deliver them, what they will cost, what has to happen first, and whether one member of Council can actually make them happen.
I would rather be clear about those limitations now than make promises I know I cannot personally guarantee.
That does not mean avoiding ambitious ideas or difficult problems. It means being honest about what it takes to move an idea from a campaign platform to an actual Council decision and, eventually, something that gets delivered.
There are some promises I am simply not going to make.
I won't promise no tax increases while promising more of everything
I understand why nobody wants their taxes to go up. I don't either.
But I won't tell residents that we can freeze taxes indefinitely while maintaining every existing service, adding new ones, replacing aging infrastructure, increasing reserves, and building new facilities. Those promises don't fit together.
What I will do is challenge spending before asking taxpayers for more. I want us looking at priorities, staffing, consultants, programs, project timing, grants, partnerships, reserves, and other funding sources before simply increasing the tax burden.
There will still be years when costs increase and Council has difficult choices to make. When that happens, residents deserve an explanation of what changed, what alternatives we considered, and why I supported or opposed the decision.
I won't promise a project without talking about the bill
It is easy to support a new facility, program, road improvement, or piece of infrastructure when the conversation stops at whether people would like to have it.
The harder conversation is what it costs, how we pay for it, what it costs to operate afterward, what else we may have to delay, and what happens if we borrow the money.
I want to have both conversations.
That doesn't mean I will only support projects that are inexpensive. Some of the most important investments Sparwood needs to make will be expensive, especially when we're talking about infrastructure that has to serve the community for decades.
But if I am asking residents to support an investment, I should also be prepared to talk openly about the financial consequences.
I won't promise another government will say yes
Some of the issues in this platform require the Province, federal government, RDEK, Interior Health, or another organization to act.
I can advocate. I can meet with the people making the decisions, bring evidence, build partnerships with other communities, apply for funding, involve our MLA or MP, and keep raising an issue when Sparwood isn't getting an adequate response.
What I can't honestly promise is that another government will give us what we ask for.
A provincial highway is still a provincial highway. Health care is still primarily a provincial responsibility. Grant programs have their own rules, and another government ultimately decides whether our application succeeds.
I won't pretend otherwise just because it makes for a better campaign promise.
What residents can expect from me is that "not our jurisdiction" won't automatically mean "not our problem."
I won't pretend one councillor controls Council
I have one vote.
I can bring an issue forward, research it, argue for it, work with other members of Council, and try to build enough support to move it forward. I cannot guarantee how six other elected people will vote.
That distinction runs through this entire platform.
When I say I want Sparwood to pursue something, I am telling you the direction I will advocate for if I am returned to Council. I am not pretending that electing one person guarantees the outcome.
There will be times when I don't have the votes. There will also be times when another councillor brings forward a better idea than mine.
Good governance requires being able to deal with both.
I won't tell you every popular idea is affordable
There are things I would love to see in Sparwood if money weren't part of the equation.
Unfortunately, it is.
Council has to weigh recreation against infrastructure, current services against future liabilities, community wants against regulatory requirements, and today's tax bill against the bills we leave for the people who come after us.
Public support matters, and major decisions should involve meaningful engagement. But popularity can't be the only test Council applies.
Sometimes the responsible answer will be "not yet." Sometimes it will be "not at that price." Occasionally, it may simply have to be "no."
If that is my position, I would rather explain why than tell people what I think they want to hear during an election.
I won't pretend I know everything
Four years on Council has taught me a lot about municipal government.
It has also taught me how quickly you can get into trouble if you assume you understand an issue before doing the work.
I have experience that helps me ask questions and work through complicated problems, but I am not an expert in every subject that comes before Council. Neither is any other councillor.
There will be times when District Staff know more than I do, when we need outside professional advice, when a resident or local business understands the practical impact of a decision better than we do, or when another member of Council sees something I've missed.
I am comfortable with that.
My responsibility isn't to walk into every conversation already knowing the answer. It is to do the work required to make a responsible decision and be willing to change my position when better information gives me a reason to.
I won't promise everything in this platform will be finished by 2030
Some of the issues I've talked about in this platform have been developing for years, and some will take years to solve.
Major infrastructure doesn't move from an idea to completion overnight. Housing depends on developers, funding, approvals, and market conditions. Highway improvements require the Province. Economic development takes time. A major recreation investment may require years of saving, grants, partnerships, design, and construction.
Putting an election date on those realities doesn't make them disappear.
What I can commit to is moving the priorities in this platform forward responsibly, being clear about where they stand, and not allowing difficult long-term issues to disappear simply because they can't be completed within one election cycle.
Four years from now, residents should be able to look back and see what moved, what didn't, what changed along the way, and why.
What I am promising
I'm asking to serve another four years because I believe there is important work ahead and because I now bring four years of Council experience to that work.
I'm promising to show up prepared, ask questions, listen before making decisions, explain my votes, respect the role of District Staff, challenge assumptions when they need to be challenged, and treat public money like the public's money.
I'm promising to advocate for the priorities I've laid out in this platform, while being honest when something requires the support of the rest of Council, another government, a funding partner, or more time than any of us would like.
And I'm promising that when circumstances change, I won't defend an old position simply because it was mine.
You may not agree with every decision I make.
I don't think any councillor should promise that you will.
What I can promise is that I will do the work, tell you where I stand, explain how I got there, and remain accountable for the vote I cast.